Atlantic Salmon a la GMO
January 6th, 2011What’s cooking in the gene kitchen? Answer: Salmon a la GMO, farm-raised Atlantic salmon genetically modified to grow twice as fast as the salmon Mother Nature provides. The FDA has not yet decided whether the fish can be marketed or labeled.
Biotech is Big Business
To the super-scientists of the biotech world, precise tinkering with plant and animal genes is a proven way to reduce disease, protect from insects and increase the food supply to curb world hunger. But for skeptics, genetic changes put the natural world and the food supply at risk, because modified organisms can escape into the wild or mingle with native species, potentially changing them, with unknown effects.
Genetic Engineering vs World Hunger
Craig Altier, a member of the Food and Drug Administration’s Veterinary Medicine Advisory Committee and an associate professor at the College of Veterinary Medicine at Cornell University, had this to say: “The fisheries of the world are being rapidly depleted and so advances in aquaculture will be needed to meet the growing demand for protein. Genetically engineered animals might help to feed the world, but they must first meet the most stringent requirements for human and environmental safety.”
Voices of Dissent
Not everyone agrees. Alaska Governor Sean Parnell, for example, has urged the federal Food and Drug Administration not to approve genetically engineered Atlantic salmon for human consumption. Parnell wrote to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg this week questioning whether the issue has been thoroughly studied. The Governor is concerned that modified salmon may jeopardize the health of wild salmon stocks.
Marion Nestle, a New York University professor and expert on food studies and public health, says that with regard to processed food, “If it’s got beet sugar, soybean or sugar, it’s got an 85 to 95 percent chance of being genetically modified.” Nestle fears that genetic engineering will lead to unintended consequences in the food supply and environment. A former member of Food and Drug Administration advisory boards, she strongly opposes the genetically engineered salmon. In the 1990s, she voted against allowing genetically engineered plants. “Animals are a bigger problem in trying to prevent mixing with nongenetically modified populations,” Nestle says. “Millions (of farmed fish) escape, not one or two, but millions.”
Maximum Security
The producer of genetically engineered salmon, Aquabounty, a Massachusetts company, plans to raise the super fish in an inland, self-contained facility. To protect wild fish stocks, these facilities would require the utmost security, rigorous inspections and constant oversight by the FDA.
References:
Science Daily, September 25, 2010, http://www.sciencedaily.com
Sign up to our newsletter: http://drclarkstore.com/newsletter-signup.html